ConcourseWorkers' Comp Opinions
All opinions
AWCC# H308127·Administrative Law Judge·Dismissed

Daniel Koster vs. Defiance Metal Products Of Ar

Decision date
Jul 16, 2025
Employer
Defiance Metal Products Of Ar
Filename
KOSTER_DANIEL_H308127_20250716.pdf
hiphernia

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. H308127 DANIEL KOSTER, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT DEFIANCE METAL PRODUCTS OF AR, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT DEFIANCE METAL PRODUCTS OF AR, INC./ RISK MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, CARRIER/TPA RESPONDENT OPINION AND ORDER FILED JULY 16, 2025 The Hearing before Administrative Law Judge James D. Kennedy, was held on July 9, 2025, in Clinton Arkansas. Claimant was pro-se and failed to appear. Respondents were represented by Carrol Lockard Worley, of Little Rock, Arkansas. STATEMENT OF THE CASE A hearing was held in the above styled matter on the 9 th day of July, 2025, in Clinton, Arkansas, on Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss for failure to prosecute pursuant to Arkansas Code Ann. 11-9-702 and Rule 099.13 of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission. The claimant was pro se and failed to appear on his own behalf. The respondents were represented by Carol Worley of Little Rock, Arkansas. A First Report of Injury was filed on December 6, 2023, which provided that the claimant was injured on December 5, 2023, and was taken to BHMC Heber Springs. A C Form was filed on December 15, 2023, which provided that the claimant was injured during the course and scope of his employment, where he sustained injuries to his abdomen, pelvis, and right hip and “other whole body.” A note from Dr. Patrick Freeman dated June 11, 2024, provided that the claimant had reached maximum medical

Daniel Koster – H308127 2 improvement in regard to his hernia under his workers’ compensation claim and that he does not have any residual impairment related to the claim and he was released to full duty on June 5, 2024. The claimant’s attorney, Laura Beth York received an Order from the Full Commission, dated August 20, 2024, allowing her to withdraw as counsel. On May 7, 2025, the respondents filed a Motion to Dismiss. No response was filed by the claimant so an appropriate notice of a Motion to Dismiss hearing was provided to the parties setting the hearing for July 9, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. A hearing was held on July 9, 2025, and the claimant failed to appear. The Respondents were represented by Carrol Worley, who requested that the matter be dismissed pursuant to Rule 099.13 of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission and A.C.A. 11-9-702. ORDER Pursuant to the above statement of the case, documents entered into the record, and statements by the Attorney for the Respondents, there is no alternative but to grant the Motion to Dismiss without prejudice pursuant to Rule 099.13 of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission and A.C.A. 11-9-702. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________ JAMES D. KENNEDY ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

Source: https://www.labor.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/KOSTER_DANIEL_H308127_20250716.pdf. Published by the Arkansas Department of Labor and Licensing, Workers' Compensation Commission. Republished here as a public reference; consult the original PDF for citation.