ConcourseWorkers' Comp Opinions
All opinions
AWCC# H206191·Administrative Law Judge·Dismissed

Alan Harden vs. Potlatchdeltic Corp

Decision date
Jan 19, 2023
Employer
Potlatchdeltic Corp
Filename
HARDEN_ALAN_H206191_20230119.pdf

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. H206191 ALAN HARDEN, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT POTLATCHDELTIC CORP., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT SENTRY CASUALTY INS. CO./ SENTRY INSURANCE CO., CARRIER/TPA RESPONDENT OPINION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE FILED JANUARY 19, 2023 Hearing conducted on Wednesday, January 18, 2023, before the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission (the Commission), Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Mike Pickens, in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. The claimant, Mr. Alan Harden, pro se, of Waldo, Columbia County, Arkansas, failed and/or refused to appear at the hearing. The respondents were represented by the Honorable Jarrod S. Parrish, Worley, Wood & Parrish, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. STATEMENT OF THE CASE A hearing was conducted on Wednesday, January 18, 2023, to determine whether this claim should be dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-702(a)(4) (2019 Lexis Replacement) and Commission Rule 099.13 (2022 Lexis Replacement). The respondents filed a motion to dismiss with the Commission on November 18, 2022, requesting this claim be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to the applicable law, the claimant was mailed a copy of the respondents’ motion to dismiss and the subject hearing notice in advance of the hearing to his last known address on two (2) separate dates: first, on November 18, 2022, and second, on December 13, 2022, via the United States Postal Service (USPS), First Class Mail, Return Receipt Requested. Thereafter, the claimant failed and/or refused to either

Alan Harden, AWCC No. H206191 2 respond to the respondents’ motion in any way, or to appear at the subject hearing. In fact, the respondents’ advised the claimant has returned to work. The record herein consists of the hearing transcript and any and all exhibits contained therein and attached thereto, as well as the Commission’s entire file in this matter. DISCUSSION Consistent with Ark. Code Ann.§ 11-9-702(a)(4), as well as our court of appeals’ ruling in Dillard vs. Benton County Sheriff’s Office, 87 Ark. App. 379, 192 S.W.3d 287 (Ark. App. 2004), the Commission scheduled and conducted a hearing on the respondents’ motion to dismiss. Rather than recite a detailed analysis of the record, suffice it to say the preponderance of the evidence introduced at the hearing and contained in the record conclusively reveals the claimant has failed and/or refused to prosecute his claim at this time. Therefore, after a thorough consideration of the facts, issues, the applicable law, and other relevant matters of record, I hereby make the following: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The Commission has jurisdiction of this claim. 2. After having been mailed due and legal notice of both the respondents’ motion and the subject hearing notice on two (2) separate occasions, the claimant failed and/or refused to respond to the motion in any way, and failed and/or refused to appear at the subject hearing. Therefore, the claimant has waived his right to a hearing on the respondents’ motion to dismiss without prejudice. 3. The claimant has to date failed and/or refused to request a hearing (although it has not yet been six (6) months since his Form AR-C was filed), and he has failed and/or refused to take any action(s) to prosecute his claim. 4. Therefore, the respondents’ motion to dismiss without prejudice filed on November 18, 2022, is GRANTED; and this claim hereby is dismissed without prejudice to its refiling pursuant to the deadlines prescribed by Ark. Code Ann. Section 11-9-702(a) and (b), and Commission Rule 099.13.

Alan Harden, AWCC No. H206191 3 This Order shall not be construed to prohibit the claimant, his attorney, any attorney he may retain in the future, or anyone acting legally and on his behalf, from refiling the claim if it is refiled within the applicable time periods prescribed by Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-702(a) and (b). The respondents hereby are ordered to pay the court reporter’s invoice within twenty (20) days of its receipt thereof. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Mike Pickens Administrative Law Judge MP/mp

Source: https://labor.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/HARDEN_ALAN_H206191_20230119.pdf. Published by the Arkansas Department of Labor and Licensing, Workers' Compensation Commission. Republished here as a public reference; consult the original PDF for citation.