ConcourseWorkers' Comp Opinions
All opinions
AWCC# H203685·Administrative Law Judge·Dismissed

Betty Butler vs. Jacksonville High School

Decision date
Jun 26, 2025
Employer
Jacksonville High School
Filename
BUTLER_BETTY_H203685_20250626.pdf
back

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO.: H203685 BETTY BUTLER, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT JACKSONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT ARKANSAS SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOC. WCT, CARRIER/TPA RESPONDENT OPINION FILED JUNE 26, 2025 Hearing held before Administrative Law Judge Chandra L. Black, in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. The Claimant, pro se, failed to appear at the hearing. Respondents represented by the Honorable Melissa Wood, Attorney at Law, Little Rock, Arkansas. STATEMENT OF THE CASE This matter comes before the Commission pursuant to a motion to dismiss filed by the Respondents. A hearing on the motion was conducted on June 11, 2025, in Little Rock, Arkansas. Presently the sole issue for determination before the Commission is whether this claim should be dismissed due to the Claimant’s failure to prosecute it under Ark. Code Ann. §11-9-702 (Repl. 2012), and/or Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission Rule 099.13. The record consists of the June 11, 2025, hearing transcript and documentary evidence. In that regard, Commission’s Exhibit 1 encompassing three (3) actual pages, as it has which has been marked accordingly, and Respondents’ Exhibit 1 consisting of seven (7) numbered pages was thus, so designated.

Butler – H203685 2 Reasonable notice of the dismissal hearing was tried on all the parties in the manner established by applicable law. No testimony was taken at the hearing. Background The record reflects the following procedural history: On December 20, 2022, the Claimant’s attorney of record in this matter filed a Form AR- C, with the Commission, alleging that the Claimant sustained an accidental injury, on May 5, 2025, while working for the respondent-employer. According to this document, the Claimant allegedly sustained compensable injuries while mopping and missed stepped and fell. The Claimant allegedly injured her right elbow, arm, hand, left leg and back. On this form, the Claimant requested both initial and additional benefits in the form of every conceivable benefit allowed under law. The Respondents a Form AR-2, with the Commission on May 20, 2022. At this time, Respondents accepted this case as a claim for compensable injuries to the Claimant’s right elbow and back. Subsequently, on May 17, 2023, the Claimant’s attorney filed a letter with the Commission a stating that he was withdrawing as counsel of record for the Claimant in this matter. There has been no objection to the Claimant’s attorney to withdraw from representing the Claimant in this case. Therefore, the above request to withdraw from this case is hereby granted. Since the filing of the Form AR-C, the Claimant has failed to prosecute or otherwise pursue her claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Specifically, it has been more than six (6) months since the filing of the Form AR-C; but thus far, the Claimant has made no bona fide request for a hearing with respect to her claim.

Butler – H203685 3 As a result, on April 14, 2025, the Respondents/the workers’ compensation claims adjuster filed with the Commission a letter-motion to dismiss this claim due to a lack of prosecution of it by the Claimant. The adjuster copied the Claimant on this correspondence, by placing a copy of it in the mail with the United States Postal Service. Subsequently, on April 16, 2025, my office wrote to the Claimant and requested a written response to the motion within twenty (20) days. Said letter was mailed to the Claimant by both first-class and certified mail to the address listed by the Claimant with the Commission. Per tracking information received from the Postal Service, on April 22, 2025, the dismissal hearing notice sent by certified mail to the Claimant was delivered to her home address listed above and left with an individual. The signature of the recipient of said letter bears the Claimant’s signature, which is legible. However, the letter sent by first-class mail, it has not been returned to the Commission. On May 7, 2025, my office sent a Notice of Hearing to the parties scheduling this matter for a dismissal hearing on June 11, 2025, at the Commission. Said hearing notice was sent to the Claimant by both first-class and certified mail to the same address as before. Tracking information received from the United States Postal Service shows that on May 9, 2025, they delivered the certified mail notice to the Claimant’s home. Specifically, the signature of the recipient section of the proof of delivery shows that this item was delivered directly to the Claimant, as it bears her signature. The notice sent by first-class mail has not been returned to the Commission. Thus, the above evidence preponderates that reasonable notice of the dismissal hearing was made upon the Claimant as required under law. Therefore, the dismissal hearing was conducted on the Respondents’ motion to dismiss this claim as formerly scheduled. Despite having received notice of the dismissal hearing, the Claimant

Butler – H203685 4 did not appear at the hearing. However, the Respondents appeared at the hearing through their lawyer. The Respondent’s counsel argued, among other things, for dismissal of this claim because the Claimant has made no bona fide request for a hearing or taken any action to prosecute or otherwise resolve his claim since the filing of the Form AR-C in December 2022. Specifically, the attorney for Respondents moved for dismissal without prejudice, under the authority of Ark. Code Ann. §11-9-702, and/or Commission Rule 099.13. Adjudication The statutory provisions and Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Rule applicable to the Respondents’ motion for dismissal of this claim for workers’ compensation benefits are outlined below: Specifically, Ark. Code Ann. §11-9-702(a)(4) provides: If within six (6) months after the filing of a claim for compensation, no bona fide request for a hearing has been made with respect to the claim, the claim may, upon motion and after hearing, be dismissed without prejudice to the refiling of the claim within the limitation periods specified in subdivisions (a)(1)-(3) of this section. Additionally, Ark. Code Ann. §11-9-702(d) states: If within six (6) months after the filing of a claim for additional compensation, no bona fide request for a hearing has been made with respect to the claim, the claim may, upon motion and after hearing, if necessary, be dismissed without prejudice to the refiling of the claim within the limitation period specified in subsection (b) of this section. Commission Rule 099.13 reads: The Commission may, in its discretion, postpone or recess hearings at the instance of either party or on its own motion. No case set for hearing shall be postponed except by approval of the Commission or Administrative Law Judge. In the event neither party appears at the initial hearing, the case may be dismissed by the Commission or Administrative Law Judge, and such dismissal order will become final unless an appeal is timely taken therefrom or a proper motion to

Butler – H203685 5 reopen is filed with the Commission within thirty (30) days from receipt of the order. Upon meritorious application to the Commission from either party in an action pending before the Commission, requesting that the claim be dismissed for want of prosecution, the Commission may, upon reasonable notice to all parties, enter an order dismissing the claim for want of prosecution. (Effective March 1, 1982) The evidence shows that the Claimant has failed to respond to the written notices of this Commission, and she did not appear at the hearing to object to the dismissal motion. Moreover, since the filing of the Form AR-C, which was done in December 2022, the Claimant has not made a bona fide request for a hearing with respect to her claim. Considering all the foregoing, I am compelled to conclude that the Claimant has abandoned her claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Accordingly, based on my review of the documentary evidence, and all other matters properly before the Commission, I find that the Respondents’ motion to dismiss this claim is warranted under the provisions of Ark. Code Ann. §11-9-702 (a)(4), §11-9-702 (d), and Rule 099.13 of this Commission. Said dismissal is without prejudice, to the refiling of this claim within the limitation period specified by law. The Claimant’s attorney’s motion to withdraw from representing her in this claim is hereby granted. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Based on the record, I hereby make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Ark. Code Ann. §11-9-704 (Repl. 2012): 1. The Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission has jurisdiction of this claim.

Butler – H203685 6 2. In December 2022, the Claimant’s attorney filed a Form AR-C with the Commission in this matter asserting her entitlement to workers’ compensation benefits due to an alleged accidental injury occurring on May 5, 2022. 3. The attorney for the Claimant is hereby permitted to withdraw from representing her in this matter. 4. Since the filing of the Form AR-C, more than six (6) months have passed, and the Claimant has not made a bona fide request for a hearing. 5. The Respondents filed with the Commission, a motion to dismiss this claim, for which a hearing was held. 6. Reasonable notice of the motion to dismiss and hearing was had on all the parties. 7. The evidence preponderates that the Respondents’ motion to dismiss this claim for want of prosecution is warranted. 8. That the Respondents’ motion to dismiss is hereby granted pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. §11-9-702 (a)(4), §11-9-702 (d), and Commission Rule 099.13, without prejudice, to the refiling of the claim within the specified limitation period. ORDER In accordance with the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the attorney for the Claimant is permitted to withdraw from representing the Claimant in this matter; and most significantly, this claim is hereby dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. §11- 9-702 and Commission Rule 099.13 to the refiling within the specified limitation period. IT IS SO ORDERED. ________________________________ CHANDRA L. BLACK Administrative Law Judge

Butler – H203685 7

Source: https://www.labor.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/BUTLER_BETTY_H203685_20250626.pdf. Published by the Arkansas Department of Labor and Licensing, Workers' Compensation Commission. Republished here as a public reference; consult the original PDF for citation.