{"id":"alj-H501985-2026-03-24","awcc_number":"H501985","decision_date":"2026-03-24","opinion_type":"alj","claimant_name":"Maria Nataly-Robles","employer_name":"Tyson Poultry, Inc","title":"NATALY ROBLES VS. TYSON POULTRY, INC. AWCC# H501985 March 24, 2026","outcome":"dismissed","outcome_keywords":["dismissed:6"],"injury_keywords":["back"],"pdf_url":"https://www.labor.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/NATALY-ROBLES_MARIA_H501985_20260324.pdf","source_index_url":"https://labor.arkansas.gov/workers-comp/awcc-opinions/administrative-law-judge-opinions/","filename":"NATALY-ROBLES_MARIA_H501985_20260324.pdf","text_length":2331,"full_text":"BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION \n \n WCC NO. H501985 \n \nMARIA NATALY ROBLES, Employee CLAIMANT \n \nTYSON POULTRY, INC., Employer RESPONDENT \n \nTYSON SHARED SERVICES, INC., Carrier RESPONDENT \n \n \n \n OPINION FILED MARCH 24, 2026 \n \nHearing  before  ADMINISTRATIVE  LAW  JUDGE  ERIC  PAUL  WELLS  in Fort  Smith, \nSebastian County, Arkansas. \n \nClaimant not represented by counsel and not appearing at hearing. \n \nRespondents represented by J. MATTHEW MAULDIN, Attorney at Law, Little Rock, Arkansas. \n \n STATEMENT OF THE CASE \n \n This case comes on for review following a hearing on respondents’ Motion to Dismiss.  \n On May 12, 2025, the claimant filed an AR-C requesting various compensation benefits \nin which she alleges an injury to her low back and left thigh on or about April 1, 2024. There has \nbeen no request for a hearing and no further action was taken in this claim. \n On November  26,  2025,  the  respondents  filed  a  Motion  to  Dismiss  requesting  that  this \nclaim  be  dismissed  for  lack  of  prosecution.  A  hearing  was  scheduled  for February  26,  2026. \nNotice  of  that  hearing  was  sent  to  the  claimant  by  certified  mail,  return  receipt  requested  on \nDecember 19, 2025. United States Postal Department records indicate that claimant received and \nsigned for the notice on December 30, 2025. On January 2, 2026, the claimant wrote a letter to \nthe Commission stating that she did not wish to proceed with her claim at this time and did not \nobject to the dismissal of her claim. The claimant did not appear at the hearing. \n\nNataly Robles – H501985 \n \n-2- \nPursuant  to  11  CAR  §25-110(d)  (previously  codified  as  Commission  Rule  099.13),  the \nCommission may enter an order dismissing a claim for want of prosecution After a review of the \nrespondents’ Motion to Dismiss, the claimant’s lack of desire to pursue her claim, and her failure \nto appear at the scheduled hearing, as well as all other matters properly before the Commission, I \nfind  that  claimant  has  failed  to  prosecute  this  claim.  Therefore,  this  claim  is  dismissed  without \nprejudice. \n IT IS SO ORDERED. \n \n                                ____________________________                                               \n       HONORABLE ERIC PAUL WELLS \n       ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE","preview":"BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. H501985 MARIA NATALY ROBLES, Employee CLAIMANT TYSON POULTRY, INC., Employer RESPONDENT TYSON SHARED SERVICES, INC., Carrier RESPONDENT OPINION FILED MARCH 24, 2026 Hearing before ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE ERIC PAUL WELLS in Fort Smith, Sebastian County, Arkan...","fetched_at":"2026-05-19T22:31:14.291Z","links":{"html":"/opinions/alj-H501985-2026-03-24","pdf":"https://www.labor.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/NATALY-ROBLES_MARIA_H501985_20260324.pdf","source_publisher":"https://labor.arkansas.gov/workers-comp/awcc-opinions/administrative-law-judge-opinions/"}}