{"id":"alj-H406303-2025-08-13","awcc_number":"H406303","decision_date":"2025-08-13","opinion_type":"alj","claimant_name":"Audra Aich","employer_name":"Butterball, LLC","title":"AICH VS. BUTTERBALL, LLC AWCC# H406303 August 13, 2025","outcome":"dismissed","outcome_keywords":["dismissed:6","granted:1"],"injury_keywords":[],"pdf_url":"https://www.labor.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/AICH_AUDRA_H406303_20250813.pdf","source_index_url":"https://labor.arkansas.gov/workers-comp/awcc-opinions/administrative-law-judge-opinions/","filename":"AICH_AUDRA_H406303_20250813.pdf","text_length":1995,"full_text":"BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION \n \n WCC NO. H406303 \n \nAUDRA AICH, Employee CLAIMANT \n \nBUTTERBALL, LLC Employer RESPONDENT \n \nCCMSI, Carrier RESPONDENT \n \n \n \n OPINION FILED AUGUST 13, 2025 \n \nHearing  before  ADMINISTRATIVE  LAW  JUDGE GREGORY  K.  STEWART in Fort \nSmith, Sebastian County, Arkansas. \n \nClaimant represented by JARID M. KINDER, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, Arkansas. \n \nRespondents  represented  by MICHAEL  E.  RYBURN,  Attorney  at  Law, Little  Rock, \nArkansas. \n \n \n STATEMENT OF THE CASE \n \n This case comes on for review following a hearing on respondent’s Motion to \nDismiss. \n On  September  27,  2024,  claimant  filed  Form  AR-C  regarding  an  injury  on  July \n15,  2024.  Respondent  has  accepted  this  claim  as  compensable  and  paid  some \ncompensation  benefits.  After  the  filing  of  the  AR-C  no  hearing  was  requested  and  on \nMay 29, 2025, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss.  \n A hearing was scheduled on respondent’s Motion to Dismiss for August 4, 2025. \nNotice of the hearing was sent to claimant by certified mail and was delivered on July 7, \n2025.  On  June  16,  2025,  claimant’s  attorney,  Jarid  Kinder,  sent  an  email  to  the \n\nAich – H406303 \n \n-2- \nCommission  indicating  that  he  had  spoken  to the claimant  and she did  not  object  to \nrespondent’s Motion to Dismiss and waived her appearance at the hearing. \n Pursuant  to  11  CAR  §25-110(d)  (previously  codified  as  Commission  Rule \n099.13), the Commission may enter an order dismissing a claim for want of prosecution.  \nAfter my review of respondent’s motion, claimant’s indication that she does not object to \nthe  dismissal,  and  all  other  matters  properly  before  the  Commission,  I  find  that \nrespondent’s  Motion  to  Dismiss  should  be  and  hereby  is  granted. This dismissal  is \nwithout prejudice.  \n IT IS SO ORDERED. \n      _______________________________ \n      GREGORY K. STEWART \n      ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE","preview":"BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. H406303 AUDRA AICH, Employee CLAIMANT BUTTERBALL, LLC Employer RESPONDENT CCMSI, Carrier RESPONDENT OPINION FILED AUGUST 13, 2025 Hearing before ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE GREGORY K. STEWART in Fort Smith, Sebastian County, Arkansas. Claimant represented by JAR...","fetched_at":"2026-05-19T22:37:24.835Z","links":{"html":"/opinions/alj-H406303-2025-08-13","pdf":"https://www.labor.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/AICH_AUDRA_H406303_20250813.pdf","source_publisher":"https://labor.arkansas.gov/workers-comp/awcc-opinions/administrative-law-judge-opinions/"}}