{"id":"alj-H406302-2025-08-11","awcc_number":"H406302","decision_date":"2025-08-11","opinion_type":"alj","claimant_name":"Tc Gilmore","employer_name":"Tyson Sales & Distribution, Inc","title":"GILMORE VS. TYSON SALES & DISTRIBUTION, INC. AWCC# H406302 August 11, 2025","outcome":"dismissed","outcome_keywords":["dismissed:5"],"injury_keywords":[],"pdf_url":"https://www.labor.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/GILMORE_TC_H406302_20250811.pdf","source_index_url":"https://labor.arkansas.gov/workers-comp/awcc-opinions/administrative-law-judge-opinions/","filename":"GILMORE_TC_H406302_20250811.pdf","text_length":1765,"full_text":"BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION \n \n WCC NO. H406302 \n \nTC GILMORE, Employee CLAIMANT \n \nTYSON SALES & DISTRIBUTION, INC., Employer RESPONDENT \n \nTYNET CORP., Carrier RESPONDENT \n \n \n \n OPINION FILED AUGUST 11, 2025 \n \nHearing   before   ADMINISTRATIVE   LAW   JUDGE GREGORY   K.   STEWART in \nSpringdale, Washington County, Arkansas. \n \nClaimant not represented by counsel and not appearing at hearing. \n \nRespondents  represented  by J.  MATTHEW  MAULDIN,  Attorney  at  Law, Little  Rock, \nArkansas. \n \n \n STATEMENT OF THE CASE \n \n This case comes on for review following a hearing on respondent’s Motion to \nDismiss. \n On  September  27,  2024,  claimant  filed  Form  AR-C  requesting  compensation \nbenefits. Since the filing of that claim no further action has been taken by the claimant to \nproceed. As a result, respondent on May 16, 2025, filed a Motion to Dismiss. A hearing \nwas  scheduled  on  respondent’s  motion  for  July  23,  2025.  Notice  of  the  scheduled \nhearing  was  sent  to  claimant  by  certified  mail  and  was  delivered  on  June  14,  2025. \nClaimant did not appear at the hearing and has not responded to respondent’s Motion \nto Dismiss. \n\nGilmore – H4063002 \n \n-2- \n Pursuant  to  11  CAR  §25-110(d)  (previously  codified  as  Commission  Rule \n099.13), the Commission may enter an order dismissing a claim for want of prosecution.  \nAfter my review of the Respondent’s Motion, the Claimant’s failure to respond thereto, \nand all other matters properly before the Commission, I find that Claimant has failed to \nprosecute this claim. Therefore, this claim is dismissed without prejudice.  \n IT IS SO ORDERED. \n      _______________________________ \n      GREGORY K. STEWART \n      ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE","preview":"BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. H406302 TC GILMORE, Employee CLAIMANT TYSON SALES & DISTRIBUTION, INC., Employer RESPONDENT TYNET CORP., Carrier RESPONDENT OPINION FILED AUGUST 11, 2025 Hearing before ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE GREGORY K. STEWART in Springdale, Washington County, Arkansas. Cl...","fetched_at":"2026-05-19T22:37:16.526Z","links":{"html":"/opinions/alj-H406302-2025-08-11","pdf":"https://www.labor.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/GILMORE_TC_H406302_20250811.pdf","source_publisher":"https://labor.arkansas.gov/workers-comp/awcc-opinions/administrative-law-judge-opinions/"}}