{"id":"alj-H207171-2023-06-08","awcc_number":"H207171","decision_date":"2023-06-08","opinion_type":"alj","claimant_name":"Rodriquez Williams","employer_name":"Yena Corp","title":"WILLIAMS VS. YENA CORP. AWCC# H207171 JUNE 8, 2023","outcome":"dismissed","outcome_keywords":["dismissed:4","granted:1"],"injury_keywords":[],"pdf_url":"https://labor.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/WILLIAMS_RODRIQUEZ_H207171_20230608.pdf","source_index_url":"https://labor.arkansas.gov/workers-comp/awcc-opinions/administrative-law-judge-opinions/","filename":"WILLIAMS_RODRIQUEZ_H207171_20230608.pdf","text_length":5356,"full_text":"1 \n \nBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION \nCLAIM NO. H207171 \n \nRODRIQUEZ X. WILLIAMS, \nEMPLOYEE CLAIMANT \n \nYENA CORP., \nEMPLOYER RESPONDENT \n \nCLEAR SPRINGS PROPERTY & CAS. CO., INC./ \nCCMSI \nCARRIER/TPA RESPONDENT \n \n \nOPINION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE \nFILED JUNE 8, 2023 \n \nHearing conducted on Wednesday, June 7, 2023, before the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation \nCommission (the Commission), Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Mike Pickens, in Little Rock, \nPulaski County, Arkansas. \n \nThe claimant is represented by the Honorable Laura Beth York, Rainwater, Holt & Sexton, Little \nRock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, who waived appearance at the hearing. \n \nThe respondents were represented by the Honorable Melissa Wood, Worley, Wood & Parrish, \nP.A., Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. \n \n \nSTATEMENT OF THE CASE \n \n A hearing was conducted on Wednesday, June 7, 2023, to determine whether this claim should \nbe dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-702(a)(4) (2023 Lexis \nReplacement) and Commission Rule 099.13 (2023 Lexis Replacement). \n The respondents accepted this claim as compensable and have to date paid all appropriate \nmedical and indemnity benefits. On both April 6, 2023, and May 5, 2023, the respondents filed \nmotions to dismiss with the Commission alleging the claimant has to date failed and/or refused to \nprosecute this claim, and that he has not requested a hearing in the last six (6) months. \n\nRodriquez X. Waller, AWCC No. H207171 \n2 \n \n Thereafter, the claimant and his attorney were provided due and legal notice of both the \nrespondents’ motions to dismiss, as well as a copy of the hearing notice for the subject hearing. \nSince the respondents have to date paid all appropriate medical and indemnity benefits and there \ncurrently exist no outstanding issues that necessitate a hearing, the claimant’s attorney did not \nobject to the respondents’ motions, and waived appearance at the subject hearing. \n The record herein consists of the hearing transcript and any and all exhibits contained therein \nand attached thereto, as well as the Commission’s entire file in this claim. \nDISCUSSION \n Consistent with Ark. Code Ann.§ 11-9-702(a)(4) (2023 Lexis Replacement), as well as our \ncourt of appeals’ ruling in Dillard vs. Benton County Sheriff’s Office, 87 Ark. App. 379, 192 \nS.W.3d 287 (Ark. App. 2004), the Commission scheduled and conducted a hearing on the \nrespondents’ motion to dismiss. Rather than recite a detailed analysis of the record, suffice it to \nsay the preponderance of the evidence introduced at the hearing and contained in the record \nconclusively reveals the claimant has failed and/or refused to prosecute his claim at this time. \n Therefore, after a thorough consideration of the facts, issues, the applicable law, representations \nof counsel, and other relevant matters of record, I hereby make the following: \n \nFINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW \n \n1. The Commission has jurisdiction of this claim. \n \n2. After having been mailed due and legal notice of both the respondents April 6, 2023, and \nMay 5, 2023, motions to dismiss without prejudice, as well as notice of the date, time, and \nplace of the subject hearing, the claimant’s attorney did not object to the motions, and \nwaived appearance at the subject hearing. \n \n3. Therefore, I find the respondents’ aforementioned motions to dismiss without prejudice \nfiled April 6, 2023, and May 5, 2023, respectively, should be and hereby are GRANTED; \nand this claim hereby is dismissed without prejudice to its refiling pursuant to the deadlines \nprescribed by Ark. Code Ann. Section 11-9-702(a) and (b), and Commission Rule 099.13. \n\nRodriquez X. Waller, AWCC No. H207171 \n3 \n \n \n This Order shall not be construed to prohibit the claimant, his attorney, any attorney he may \nretain in the future, or anyone acting legally and on his behalf from refiling the claim if it is \nrefiled within the applicable time periods prescribed by Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-702(a) and (b). \n If they have not already done so, the respondents hereby are ordered to pay the court \nreporter’s invoice within twenty (20) days of their receipt thereof. \n IT IS SO ORDERED. \n \n____________________________ \n Mike Pickens \n Administrative Law Judge \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \nMP/mp \n \n \n\nRodriquez X. Waller, AWCC No. H207171 \n4 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \nMP/mp","preview":"1 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. H207171 RODRIQUEZ X. WILLIAMS, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT YENA CORP., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CLEAR SPRINGS PROPERTY & CAS. CO., INC./ CCMSI CARRIER/TPA RESPONDENT OPINION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE FILED JUNE 8, 2023","fetched_at":"2026-05-19T23:06:10.974Z","links":{"html":"/opinions/alj-H207171-2023-06-08","pdf":"https://labor.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/WILLIAMS_RODRIQUEZ_H207171_20230608.pdf","source_publisher":"https://labor.arkansas.gov/workers-comp/awcc-opinions/administrative-law-judge-opinions/"}}